Yak Sbi Po Previous Papers : Reasoning - Argumentation (Set 1)

Directions (1-5) : In making conclusion close of import questions, it is desirable to live able to distinguish be-tween "Strong" arguments too "Weak" arguments too so far as they relate to the questions. "Strong" arguments are those which are both of import too straight related to the question. "Weak" arguments are those which are of kid importance too likewise may non live straight related to the questions or may live related to a short facial expression of the questions. (Asked inwards SBI Banks PO Exam. 20.08.2000) 

Instructions : Each inquiry be-low is followed past times ii arguments numbered I too II. You possess got to determine which of the arguments is a "Strong" declaration too which is a "Weak" argument. 

Give response (1) if exclusively declaration I is "strong".

Give response (2) if exclusively declaration II is "strong". 

Give response (3) if either I or II is "strong". 

Give response (4) if neither I nor II is "strong", and 

Give response (5) if both I too II are "strong". 

1. Statement : Should authorities established higher degree Institutes of Technology (IIT's) live privatised ?


Arguments : 

I . Yes, privatisation volition brand these institutes financially healthy, competitive too character conscious. II. Yes, privatisation is the commutation of the novel era-can nosotros endure without it ? 

2. Statement : Should vacations of courtroom judges live reduced ? 

Arguments : 

I. Yes, it volition speed upwardly judicial procedure too many people are probable to larn justice inwards reasonable time. II. Yes, it is a sign of British legacy, why should nosotros ship it farther ? 

3. Statement : Should the practise of transfers of clerical cadres employees from 1 urban center to an-other authorities offices live stopped ? 

Arguments : 

I. No, transfer of employees is a routine administrative thing too nosotros must locomote along it. 

II. Yes, it involves lot of governmental expenditure too inconvenience to many compared to the benefits it yields. 

4. Statement : Should higher qualification live the exclusively criteria for internal promotions inwards whatever organisation ? 

Arguments : 

I. Yes, why not? In fact exclusively higher qualification is to a greater extent than of import than other factors.

II. No, character of functioning too other factors are to a greater extent than of import than mere higher qualification inwards instance of internal promotion. 

5. Statement : Should Indian scientists working abroad live called dorsum to Bharat ? 

Arguments : 

I. Yes, they must serve the motherland get-go too forget close discoveries, honours, facilities too all. II. No, nosotros possess got plenty talent, allow them rest where they want. 

Directions (6-10) : In making decisions close of import questions, it is desirable to live able to distinguish betwixt 'strong' arguments too 'weak' arguments too so far as they relate to the question. 'Strong arguments are those which are both of import too straight related to the question. 'Weak' arguments are those which are of kid importance too likewise may non live straight related to the questions or may live related to a short facial expression of the question. (SBI Banks PO Exam. 11.02.2001) 

In each inquiry below a state-ent is followed past times ii arguments numbered I too II. You possess got to determine which of the arguments is a 'strong argument. 

Give response (1) if exclusively declaration - I is strong. 

Give response (2) if exclusively declaration II is strong.

Give response (3) if either I or II is strong. 

Give response (4) if neither I nor II is strong. 

Give response (5) if both I too II are strong. 

6. Should the schoolhouse teachers live necessarily involved inwards the census activities ? 

Arguments : 

I. No, this volition adversely deport upon the character of teaching programme.

II. Yes, the teachers are the best jibe for this job. 

7. Should Bharat engage into a dialogue alongside neighbouring countries 'to halt cross edge tension ?' 

Arguments : 

I. Yes, this is the exclusively way to trim the cross edge terrorism too halt loss of innocent lives. 

II. No, neighbouring countries cannot live relied upon inwards such matters, they may yet engage inwards subversive activities. 

8. Should all the utility services live at 1 time brought nether essential services to avoid frequent agitation too strikes past times the employees ? 

Arguments :

I. No, otherwise how the employees may vocalization their grievances too demands. 

II. Yes, the employees are be-coming to a greater extent than too to a greater extent than greedy too they possess got the full general populace for a ride past times hitting work. 

9. Should all the unauthorised structures inwards the urban center live at 1 time demolished ?

Arguments : 

I. No, where volition the people re-siding inwards such houses alive ?

II. Yes, this volition give a clear mes-sage to full general populace too they volition refrain from constructing unauthorised buildings. 

10. Should the railways inwards Bharat live privatised inwards a phased way similar other populace sector enterprises ? 

Arguments : 

I. Yes, this 's the exclusively way to convey inwards competitiveness too furnish ameliorate service to the public.

II. No, this volition pose a threat to national safety of our province as multinationals volition locomote into into the fray. 

Directions (11-15) : In making decisions close of import questions it is desirable to live able to distinguish betwixt 'strong' arguments too 'weak' arguments too so far as they relate to the question. 'Strong arguments are those which are both of import too straight related to the question. 'Weak' arguments are those which are of kid importance too likewise may non live straight related to the inquiry or may live related to short facial expression of the question. (Asked inwards BI Associate Banks PO Exam. 21.07.2002)

Each inquiry below is followed past times ii arguments numbered I too II. You possess got to determine which of the arguments is a 'strong declaration too which is a 'weak' argument. 

Give response (1) if exclusively declaration I is strong 

Give response (2) if exclusively declaration II is strong 

Give response (3) if either I or II is strong. 

Give response (4) if neither I nor H is strong. 

Give response (5) if both I too II are strong. 

11. Should the tenure of the President live longer ? 

Arguments 

I. No. The President of Bharat is non-executive head. Therefore, at that spot is no demand to extend his tenure. 

II. Yes. It volition furnish an chance to President to guide he Government to fulfil the long term objectives. 

12. Should at that spot live concentration of unusual investment inwards exclusively few US ? 

Arguments

I. No. It is against the policy of overall evolution of country. 

II. Yes. Because a large publish of US lack infrastructure to attract unusual investment. 

13. Should at that spot live a consummate ban on opening upwardly of novel administration educational institutions ? 

Arguments

I. Yes. There are to a greater extent than institutions than required too at that spot is no demand to opened upwardly up novel institutions. 

II. No. We demand to a greater extent than professional person managers inwards coming days because the futurity scenario volition live rattling competitive. 

14. Should private organisations live allowed to ship on safety related enquiry activities ? 

Arguments

I. No. Private organisations are easily vulnerable to our enemies too therefore, they should non live permitted to ship on such researches. 

II. Yes. The Government has non sufficient resources to ship on such researches too the private organisations would larn by necessary resources. 

15. Should at that spot live recruitment inwards banks on the footing of past times academic performances rather than through competitive examinations ?

Arguments

I. Yes. It volition live beneficial for those candidates who are unable to deport the expenses of competitive examinations. 

II. No. The past times academic functioning cannot live made the footing of recruitment because at that spot is no uniformity inwards the assessment past times the universities. 

Directions (16-20) : In making decisions close of import questions, it is desirable to live able to distinguish betwixt 'strong arguments too 'weak' arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both of import too straight related to the question. 'Weak'  arguments are those which are of kid importance too likewise may non live straight related to the inquiry or may live related to a short facial expression of the question. (Asked inwards SBI Bank PO Exam. 18.05.2003)

Each inquiry below is followed past times ii arguments numbered I too II. You possess got to determine which of the declaration is a 'strong' declaration too which is a 'weak' argument. 

Give response (1) if exclusively declaration I is strong. 

Give response (2) if exclusively declaration II is strong. 

Give response (3) if either I or II is strong. 

Give response (4) if neither I nor II is strong. 

Give response (5) if both I too II are strong. 

16. Should all beggars on the roads inwards the large cities inwards Bharat live forcibly sent to villages ? 

Arguments : 

I. No, this is grossly unfair too these people volition buy the farm of hunger if they are sent to villages. 

II. Yes, these people create a bad impression of our province inwards the eyes of the foreigners who catch our province too hence should live removed. 

17. Should all the criminals convicted for committing murder live awarded upper-case alphabetic character penalization ? 

Arguments :

I. Yes, this volition live a pregnant footstep towards reducing cases of murder inwards future. 

II. No, nobody has the correct to possess got whatever person's life irrespective of the acts of such individuals. 

18. Should all the professional person colleges inwards Bharat live encouraged to run their ain courses without affiliation to whatever academy ?

Arguments : 

I. Yes, this is exclusively way to create to a greater extent than opportunities for those who seek professional person training. 

II. No, this volition dilute the character of professional person grooming as all such colleges may non live equipped to behavior such courses. 

19. Should at that spot live a maximum ceiling imposed on the earnings of an private inwards an organization? 

Arguments :

I. Yes, this volition care equitable distribution of earnings to all the employees.

II. No, the arrangement should possess got complimentary manus to determine the pay packets of its employees.

20. Should at that spot live a compulsory armed forces grooming for each college educatee inwards Bharat ?

Arguments :

I. No, this goes against the basic democratic correct of an private to guide his / her ain programs. 

II. Yes, this is the exclusively way to build a potent too powerful nation. 

Solutions :

1. (4) Neither of the arguments is strong. It is truthful that privatisation may brand Institutes of Technology financially healthy too competitive considering the prevalent tendency of market. But it cannot live taken as universally true. Hence, declaration I is non strong. The minute declaration lacks whatever kernel too hence it is non strong. 
2. (1) Taking into concern human relationship the fact that a large publish of cases are pending inwards the courts for a long time, it is desirable that vacations of courtroom judges must live reduced to speed upwardly judicial process. Therefore, declaration I seems to live strong. Argument II is based on an instance too nosotros know that citing an instance is a bad argumentation. 
3. (4) It is non necessary that if whatever practise which has been inwards style for long fourth dimension is correct too it must live continued. Therefore, declaration I is non strong. Argument H is partly truthful too hence it cannot live strong. 
4. (4) It is an established fact that higher qualification could non live exclusively criteria for whatever form of advertisement inwards an organisation. Other factors are likewise as important. It is rattling hard to assess the higher qualification too other factors on the same scale. Therefore, neither of the arguments is strong. 
5. (4) Neither of the arguments is strong. None of the arguments holds potent vis-a-vis the statement. 
6. (4) None of the arguments is strong. The census activities possess got a few days too the loss incurred inwards the classes tin live compensated past times organising extra classes or pruning the holidays. Therefore, declaration I is non strong. Other persons may likewise attain the project of census rattling well. Therefore, declaration II is likewise non strong. 
7. (1) Only declaration I holds strong. In the introduce context the solution of whatever major work lies inwards the proper dialogue betwixt the concerned parties. Argument II is based on individual's sentiment too hence it cannot live strong.
8. (4) None of the arguments is strong. The employees may heighten thier de-mands past times other agency also. 
9. (2) Only declaration II is strong. Unauthorised constructions create many other problems. The people may live shifted to or too so regularised colonies. 
10. (4) The purpose of the discussion "only" inwards the declaration I makes it invalid. The policy of opened upwardly marketplace advocates privatisation. Each province is opening its marketplace for unusual investors. How, privatisation volition pose a threat to national safety ? 
11. (4) Neither of the arguments is potent enough. The President of Bharat is constitutional caput of the State, yet he is an integral component of the Parliament which decides policy matters Therefore, declaration I is non strong. The declaration II does non lift whatever specific reason. 
12. (1) Only declaration I is strong. We cannot locomote out the backward portion to remain backward. 
13. (2) Managerial science is required inwards every sphere of developmental activities too therefore, a consummate ban on opening upwardly of novel administration educational institutions is non justified inwards whatever way. Hence, exclusively declaration II is strong. 
14. (4) At a glance both the arguments appear to live strong. But considering the rattling nature of the private organisation, i.e. net turn a profit making only, nosotros cannot manus over such dandy responsibleness inwards the hands of private companies. Again, the declaration I does non lift how the private organisations are easily vulnerable to our enemies. 
15. (4) Neither of the arguments is potent enough. None of the arguments passes the desir mightiness criteria. 
16. (1) The problems of beggars cannot live solved past times sending them to villages. Therefore, declaration I seems to live strong. 
17. (1) Argument I seems to live strong. 
18. (4) The lift of the term 'only inwards declaration I makes it invalid. Argument II is likewise invalid. 
19. (4) Neither of the arguments is strong. 
20. (1) Argument I seems to live strong. 

sponsored links

Share this post